Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Phillip J. Murphy Attorney at Law New City Criminal Defense Attorney
  • ~
  • Calls answered and returned 24/7

A Discussion of Views on the Death Penalty Surrounding the Pittsburgh Shooting


In the wake of the terrible tragedy that occurred at the Pittsburgh synagogue in late October and resulted in the death of 11 people, federal and state prosecutors are preparing to move forward with capital murder charges against the suspect connected with the incident, Robert Bowers. Bowers was charged in a 44-count indictment that includes charges of hate crimes, murder, and obstructing the practice of religion.

Today, the death penalty is rare, and typically carried out at the local or state level. However, rabbis, specifically, are opposed to it—even in this case—as we discuss below.

Historical Treatment of Capital Punishment

While capital punishment exists in Jewish law (and, specifically, in the Torah), it has rarely been used, and is strongly discouraged. The Torah itself distinguishes between intentional homicide and the evidentiary standards required to affirm it–whereby capital punishment is theoretically/historically appropriate–and non-intentional homicide, where it is not. Historically, the tribunal that historically heard capital cases could not impose a death sentence unless and until it heard from two eyewitnesses and both eyewitnesses first needed to see each other, warn the assailant of the consequences of their actions, and hear the perpetrator’s verbal assent. The only person that the state of Israel has ever executed judicially is Otto Adolf Eichmann, a high-ranking member of Nazi leadership who was responsible for a number of Jewish extermination camps and deaths.

Contemporary Perspectives

Still, today, in response to the Pittsburgh shooting incident, many rabbis and others in the community have pointed out that they are no longer dealing with the formal Jewish legal system but rather contemporary society, and the proper religious response is not to take a person’s life at all; nor for the state to do so; even in this case. Specific movements—such as Reform Judaism—oppose the state’s use of the death penalty as a matter of principle because those who follow it state that there are no crimes where the taking of a human life is justified. According to them, even the synagogue gunman does not deserve the death penalty and this is, in part, due to overall moral concerns that the U.S. justice system currently applies punishments unequally.  Some have specifically noted that society should not be putting people to death “unless it is the only way to prevent them from causing more crime.”

Contact Our Criminal Defense Attorneys to Find Out More

If you have been accused of a violent crime and face significant penalties as a result, contact our experienced criminal defense attorney Phillip J. Murphy for the very best in criminal defense services throughout New York and New Jersey.


By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation