Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
Free Consultations Calls answered and returned 24/7
New City Criminal Defense Attorney
Free Consultations Calls answered and returned 24/7

New Jersey’s “Red Flag” Law Comes Under Fire for Constitutional Issues; Those Targeted Feel Like Criminals Without a Trial


Under New Jersey’s new “red flag” law, also known as the Extreme Risk Protective Order Act, approximately 200 people have had their guns seized after law enforcement or a family member submitted a petition to the court successfully arguing that they pose a danger of causing bodily injury to themselves or others. However, New Jersey’s law – like others around the country – has come under scrutiny regarding whether it violates constitutional rights because if a judge determines that there is cause to remove an individual’s guns, they issue a search warrant in order to recover the guns and ammunition without the requisite showing of probable cause. Below, we discuss how the law works and some of the civil rights concerns associated with it:

How It Works

The orders issued under the red flag law are based on the structure and procedure that domestic violence protection orders follow under New Jersey’s Prevention of Domestic Violence Act in that they are civil court orders, issued by a judge, that are based on a consideration of evidence related to whether the person has:

  • Any history of use of physical force
  • Any history of violence or threats of violence
  • Been subject to any protective orders
  • Been arrested, charged, or convicted of any disorderly persons, domestic violence, animal cruelty, violent indictable, or stalking offenses
  • Any history of substance abuse
  • Recently acquired ammunition or a firearm

After the temporary order is granted and the firearms are seized, the individual is entitled to a hearing within 10 days before the final order is issued. While this final order lasts indefinitely, the individual can also seek to have it terminated at any time.

Is This Search & Seizure Constitutional?

While those who support the law point out that it has been used by family members who are concerned about, for example, a child in their household who is struggling with depression and might have suicidal tendencies, as well as to prevent those who threaten mass shootings, a class action federal lawsuit has also been brought alleging due process violations because hearings are not granted prior to the temporary orders being issued and firearms being seized. The lawsuit also alleges that the search warrant is unconstitutional because it is based on “good cause” and not the standard “probable cause.”

Resolutions Adopted

A number of New Jersey townships – such as Stillwater – have also started to adopt resolutions declaring towns to be “Second Amendment/Lawful Gun Owner Townships” and some municipalities are also declaring themselves to be “Second Amendment Municipalities.”

If You Have Concerns About Your Civil Rights, Contact Our New Jersey Attorneys

If you have concerns about civil rights violations, contact our New Jersey criminal defense attorneys at the office of Phillip J. Murphy today to find out how we can help.







Contact Our Firm

Phillip J. Murphy,
Attorney At Law
Free Consultations Calls Answered and returned 24/7 Phone: (845) 639-6600 Fax: (845) 639-6620

Locations & Directions

10 Esquire Road, Suite 10
New City, New York 10956

We Accept

  • Master Card
  • American Express
  • Discover
  • Visa

Phillip J. Murphy, Attorney At Law is located in New City, New York and serves clients in and around New York, New Jersey & Connecticut. Contact our experienced criminal defense law firm.
- Home - Site Map -

MileMark Media - Practice Growth Solutions

© 2015 - 2024 Phillip J. Murphy, Attorney At Law. All rights reserved.
This law firm website is managed by MileMark Media.

Contact Form Tab